Problem with the link? I'm getting an internal error by clicking on this link.

Hmm, somehow it doesn't work anymore when trying to link directly to one answer in a post.

Let's try this:
www.limesurvey.org/en/community-services...s-and-ranking-design

Also not working. Then we'll go the old fashioned way:
You basically need to find Denis's post:

RANKING: What do you need
SINGLECHOICE: hidden with OUT or OK (hidden)
EQUATION: {SINGLECHOICE=if(conditions_for_out,'OUT','OK')} (hidden)

I don't want to screenout something.

My problem is how to filter (afterwards by reviewing the results) technicians from non technicians.

So, my thought was to make a 12th hidden question with radio options. And therefore on my {if} rule something is selected by default (technician or non technician).

Is this possible. Because if this is possible it would be very fine to use the filter system in backend of lime.
I only have to click the value technician and other relevant information. But for reviewing i also need to filter non technician. Only by the number code it would be hard to filter the information. Because the number code can have for non technician 1-8.

Thx for your help.

Well, the example of Dennis doesn't screen out anyone. The only thing it does is checking an answer in a single choice question, depending on the outcome of something.

So in your case you would have a singlechoice question, let's call it "result".

There you put two answers:
1. technician
2. non technician

Then after that you put an equation question with a code that looks like this:
{result=if(points >= 8, 1, 2}

Points would be the name of your equation where you calculate your points.

Even easier, without a the single choice / radio button question you just write an equation like this:
{if(points >= 8, "technician", "non technician")}

This should write the respective choice into the equation question and you can use this for analysis. You could also put codes like 1 or 2 instead.

Here a working example based on your questionnaire.




You might want to rethink the question about the films and 4GB and FAT. First of all, there is some error in the text. Not 100% clear.

And then FAT itself has a limit of 2GB, so "no" would be correct. But as far as I know FAT32 supports up to 4GB, which means 3 films of 4GB should fit on the USB stick...

you are the best man! :woohoo:

Thx very much.