- Posts: 5056
- Thank you received: 1267
Ask the community, share ideas, and connect with other LimeSurvey users!
Why all the videos and own server, generic theme requirements? It's a JavaScript issue (recalculating style, reapplying style, CPU till 100%). Or the survey file itself contains something.DenisChenu wrote: Like i say : for reporting an issue
Session files are not filling up the memory by default, but the storage.holch wrote: 256 MB of memory is fairly low, in my opinion, especially if you want to run bigger studies. LS creates realtively big session files and your memory might fill up quicker as you think.
jelo wrote:
As showed a few times the issue is in the javascript theme routines. If survey creators monitor their surveys they will see a dropout on questions with this problematic behavior. Mobile device browser will be even more slower (performance, memory limits). The root cause is unknown to me. The question is, if it's an issue inside the provided lss export or a generic questiontype issue.
I spoke with one user who have 100 line array with a lot hidden, and there are issue.holch wrote: As showed a few times the issue is in the javascript theme routines. If survey creators monitor their surveys they will see a dropout on questions with this problematic behavior. Mobile device browser will be even more slower (performance, memory limits). The root cause is unknown to me. The question is, if it's an issue inside the provided lss export or a generic questiontype issue.
Yes, there are, even in github.com/SondagesPro/LimeSurvey-SondagesPro i'm late on security checking (must look at security fix on 3.X)silverlime wrote: As there seems to be no quick solution for versions 3.X, I plan to stay with Version 2.X: Do you consider version " limesurvey2.6.7-lts+171212" still as secure or are there known vulnerabilities in it?
The javascript checking for action is done here : github.com/LimeSurvey/LimeSurvey/blob/ma...avascript.js#L26-L48silverlime wrote: Could you explain "I think it can be done disable the default events on the item." Is there a possible workaround which i could test?