hi

what is different " that each entry is greater than three, you would set the "Sub-question validation equation" to (this > 3) " with "minimum answer 3" ?

Hi,

minimum answer : 3 => count(self) >= 3

not (this >3)

Where do you see that ?

Denis

thanks for reply denis

i see( this > 3) in this link
www.limesurvey.org/manual/Expression_Man....27that.27_variables


and minimum answer in array number

with "this > 3", it's not "minimum answer" but more like minimum value.

In a multi numeric question : it's the same tahn minimum_value > 3 mandatory.

In general : all advanced settings of question can be done with Sub-question validation equation or Question validation equation.

Sometimes : advanced settings add some JS (exclude_all_others for example), and have a "default translated string'.

HI
I have a "array" question (multi-items), and I put the option "mandatory answer". I set a minimum number of answers (X).
The message "you need to fill at least X questions" appears in the questionnaire, but it doesn't work: I need to fill ALL the questions to pass to the next page.
Do you know why? Is there any other operation to do?
Thank you !!!

You need to use either the mandatory setting (all rows answered) or minimum answers (n rows answered), not both.

great, it works ! thank you !!
another question on that topic : I put this option (X rows) on a "multiple numeric array", with cursors. When I try to pass to the next question without answering to X answers, then it says "please answer at least X questions", but then all the cursors are set automatically in the middle position (with a value "0", that I set), and if I push "next" I can pass the question without answering to X questions. And all the cursors have the default value "0"
(NB : I haven't chosen the option "put the cursor in the middle position" to avoid this "0 defaut value" that allow to pass to the next question without answering)
Is that clear? I hope !
Thank you

Hi ,

It's OK with a 2.06 version, then surely a 2.50 bug. Miust be reported.

Denis

Don't have time to up-grade... ;-(
Ok I will report. But may you remind me how to go on the right bug tracker page (last time I've been on the wrong one...). Thank you

Yes,

You need to select "BUG" at top/right.

But the last build have less tha 1 hour. Think it can be interseting to manually upgrade.

Denis

Yes, true.
but the last time that I up-graded, the model I built was not compatible with the new version. I had to restart from "default" and operate all the changes in CSS, etc. I would like to avoid that risk. I'm using Version 2.50+ Build 160418

Totally right .....

One of the reason of SkeletonQUest not fixed/started actually ....

I really don't like the new system for template : no "global css or js" : when a fix is done on default : fix must be applied for owner template....

I don't understand why we add bootstrap ....

Denis
PS : this must be reported too

Denis, your remark made me think (of course...): do you know of an architecture where the core of LS could prescribe a really default template and where all custom template would be done by using the default template and overrides in the custom template?

Tammo

tammo wrote: Denis, your remark made me think (of course...): do you know of an architecture where the core of LS could prescribe a really default template and where all custom template would be done by using the default template and overrides in the custom template?

Tammo

Hi Tammo,

Yes : i really think a real template/theming system can be
Final template EXTEND own template EXTEND another template EXTEND default template.

BUT : it's my point of view, i do a feature request , i put some remark on actual system (for example : no core JS file for slider in 2.50, have core JS file in 2.06 ..: always). I don't think it's the way the development goes actually ....