I was asking about the structure, because when you do research with real people, there could be other reasons and obviously you are showing different things. Let's assume that one path is longer, more tedious, the questions are more annoying, the text is more complicated or something you might have more drop outs. But of course this wouldn't explain if you do an analysis over all started interviews.

I see what you mean now. But, the two conditions are equally tedious (and man, are they tedious); in any event, the replies I'm talking about are all compete complete replies, so the point is moot anyway.

Hehehehe, in this case it is probably just chance, though slightly skewed.