Hello,
thanks I see your approach and it's surely working well. But unfortunately this does not solve my problem.
The example I gave was only a brief abstraction. That is why I belive I need to directly adress different questions (or in some cases none) within the array filter field (of question D in my example).
To be more detailed, I do have:
-a question A (it is in reality an equation giving a number between 1 and 25)
-a question B (it is a hidden multiple selection with 5 subquestions SQ001 to SQ005 and depending on A the subquestions are filled by an EM with 1 or they are empty)
-a question C (same like B, other EM formula) - maybe I can dispense this question, dont know at the moment
- at last: 5 questions D (D1, D2, ..., D5 all with 5 subquestions SQ001 to SQ005
Now: Depending on the result of A (a value between 1 to 25) only a part of the 5 D-questions are shown
if A <= 5 only D1
if A <= 11 D1 and D2
if A <= 16 D1, D2 and D3
if A <= 20 D1, D2, D3 an D4
if A > 20 all (D1,D2,D3,D5,D5) are shown
The point is: only the LAST ONE of the D's has to be filtered by question C, all other (i.e. D1 to D(n-1) ) has to be filtered by question B (or may be I will not need any filter for these not-the-last ones).
So for example:
if result of A == 14 then
D1 and D2 has to be filtered by question B (or may be not being filtered)
D3 has to be filtered by question C
(D4 and D5 are not visible by relevance equation)
Another example:
if result of A == 22
D1, D2, D3, D4 has to be filtered by question B (or may be not being filtered)
D5 has to be filtered by question C
A little bit complicated, kind of brainteaser, I know :woohoo:
Best regards/Beste Grüße,
O. Villani
The topic has been locked.