I created the survey in which the first question group consists question related to introduction , which i want to show all question at once , whereas the questions of other group show one by one ... Currently i selected to show to show all question one by one from the "Presentation and Navigation Option " . So it is possible to show all questions of one group ?

If you choose one by one : this shown one by one.

To show all question in a group : use group by group.

Something i don't understand ?

What if want to show all question of group 1 ... and show group 2 question one by one

burhandodhy wrote: What if want to show all question of group 1 ... and show group 2 question one by one

You can't.

Use group by group mode with one or 2 questions by group.

As Denis says.

Limesurvey unfortunately doesn't have a "page" concept. But you can use the question groups as some kind of "page". However, this means that you can't use the group for the survey "logic" anymore, if this logic isn't 100% in line with the "page" concept that you have in mind. So put in the first group various questions, then create one group per following question. Unfortunately currently this is the only option.

holch wrote: Limesurvey unfortunately doesn't have a "page" concept. But you can use the question groups as some kind of "page".

....

Hi holch, for me : really group == page.

Not used for anything else.

Yes, in most cases for me page == question group as well.

However, there are cases where one would need to separate those two concepts. E.g. when you use group randomization.

holch wrote: As Denis says... put in the first group various questions, then create one group per following question. Unfortunately currently this is the only option.

I'm guessing there is no update on this and that Denis' suggestion is still the only work-around?

Yes.

Thanks...

bruce78 wrote:

holch wrote: As Denis says... put in the first group various questions, then create one group per following question. Unfortunately currently this is the only option.

I'm guessing there is no update on this and that Denis' suggestion is still the only work-around?

Confirm