- Posts: 78
- Thank you received: 2
Welcome to the LimeSurvey Community Forum
Ask the community, share ideas, and connect with other LimeSurvey users!
Partial Randomization of ranking question
- tixeon
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
1 year 8 months ago - 1 year 8 months ago #223442
by tixeon
Partial Randomization of ranking question was created by tixeon
Please help us help you and fill where relevant:
Your LimeSurvey version: 5.2.7
Own server or LimeSurvey hosting: Limesurvey Hosting
Theme: Extension of Fruity
==================
Hi there,
I would like to fix certain sub-questions at the end of a randomised ranked-choice list. I have found a previous forum request for my requirement except the script does not seem to work on my version of Limesurvey (v5.2.7) - The sub-question codes I enter are still randomised.
It may be due to the script being for an older version - if that is the case, please provide an updated script that works with v5 - here's the link to the previous script:
forums.limesurvey.org/forum/design-issue...or-ranking-questions
I have also attached an example Qn.
Your LimeSurvey version: 5.2.7
Own server or LimeSurvey hosting: Limesurvey Hosting
Theme: Extension of Fruity
==================
Hi there,
I would like to fix certain sub-questions at the end of a randomised ranked-choice list. I have found a previous forum request for my requirement except the script does not seem to work on my version of Limesurvey (v5.2.7) - The sub-question codes I enter are still randomised.
It may be due to the script being for an older version - if that is the case, please provide an updated script that works with v5 - here's the link to the previous script:
forums.limesurvey.org/forum/design-issue...or-ranking-questions
I have also attached an example Qn.
Last edit: 1 year 8 months ago by tixeon. Reason: Add example attachment
The topic has been locked.
- Joffm
-
- Offline
- LimeSurvey Community Team
-
Less
More
- Posts: 11735
- Thank you received: 3630
1 year 8 months ago - 1 year 8 months ago #223443
by Joffm
Volunteers are not paid.
Not because they are worthless, but because they are priceless
Replied by Joffm on topic Partial Randomization of ranking question
Hi,
please, neither provide lsg nor lsq exports, only lss.
Reason: lsg and lsq exports are language sensitive. You can only import them into a survey with the same base language.
So we have to guess the base languagfe of your export, create a survey with this same base language and import your question/group.
Please, help us to help you.
Therefore I only used the linked "old" example.
If you use the webdevelopment tool of your browser you see that the class ".dragdropChoiceList" is replaced by ".sortable-choice" (since LS is bases on bootstrap, version 3.x)
So exchange it and it will be fine.
Joffm
I avoid saying anything about the idea of ranking "Other, please, specify"
please, neither provide lsg nor lsq exports, only lss.
Reason: lsg and lsq exports are language sensitive. You can only import them into a survey with the same base language.
So we have to guess the base languagfe of your export, create a survey with this same base language and import your question/group.
Please, help us to help you.
Therefore I only used the linked "old" example.
If you use the webdevelopment tool of your browser you see that the class ".dragdropChoiceList" is replaced by ".sortable-choice" (since LS is bases on bootstrap, version 3.x)
So exchange it and it will be fine.
Joffm
I avoid saying anything about the idea of ranking "Other, please, specify"
Volunteers are not paid.
Not because they are worthless, but because they are priceless
Last edit: 1 year 8 months ago by Joffm.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tixeon
The topic has been locked.
- tixeon
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 78
- Thank you received: 2
1 year 8 months ago #223450
by tixeon
Replied by tixeon on topic Partial Randomization of ranking question
Thank you Joffm, replacing ".dragdropChoiceList" with ".sortable-choice" has resolved the issue.
Re: ...please, neither provide lsg nor lsq exports, only lss.... - Noted for future reference.
Re: ...please, neither provide lsg nor lsq exports, only lss.... - Noted for future reference.
The topic has been locked.